4.7 Article

Effect of condenser geometrical feature on evacuated tube collector basin solar still performance: Productivity optimization using a Box-Behnken design model

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 542, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.116092

Keywords

Solar water desalination; Box-Behnken design; Condenser volume; Condenser surface

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an evacuated tube collector was used as the basin of the solar still, and the effect of condenser geometry on distilled water production was investigated. The optimal conditions for maximum water production were determined, and the selected operating factors were found to significantly affect the volume of water produced by solar desalination.
Solar water desalination is still one of the most efficient techniques in water and wastewater treatment. In the present study, an evacuated tube collector (ETC) was used as the basin of the solar still. A cube-shaped glass condenser was attached on top of the ETC for vapor condensation. The main purpose was to investigate the effect of condenser geometry, including volume, surface, and wall thickness on distilled water production. The optimal conditions to produce a maximum volume of distilled water were determined using response surface methodology (RSM), based on the Box-Behnken design (BBD) model. All selected operating factors significantly affect the volume of water produced by solar desalination. The maximum volume of produced water was 7.231 kg.m(-2). day(-1), which was obtained at the condenser volume of 2940 cm(3), the condenser wall thickness of 4 mm, and the condenser surface of 3360 cm(2). R-2 and R-adj(2) values in the selected model were 0.9934 and 0.9815, respectively. The validation experiment confirmed the high accuracy of the BBD model for predicting the optimal conditions to achieve the maximum amount of produced water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available