4.8 Article

Orbitofrontal cortex populations are differentially recruited to support actions

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 21, Pages 4675-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Whitehall Foundation Award
  2. [F99-NS120434]
  3. [F31AA027439]
  4. [R01AA026077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the important role of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in utilizing prior action information to guide behavior. Using experiments on mice, researchers discovered that genetically identified lOFC subpopulations instantiate current and prior action information to varying degrees during ongoing action execution.
The ability to use information from one's prior actions is necessary for decision-making. While orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been hypothesized as key for inferences made using cue and value-related information, whether OFC populations contribute to the use of information from volitional actions to guide behavior is not clear. Here, we used a self-paced lever-press hold-down task in which mice infer prior lever-press dura-tions to guide subsequent action performance. We show that the activity of genetically identified lateral OFC (lOFC) subpopulations differentially instantiate current and prior action information during ongoing action execution. Transient state-dependent lOFC circuit disruptions of specified subpopulations reduced the en-coding of ongoing press durations but did not disrupt the use of prior action information to guide future action performance. In contrast, a chronic functional loss of lOFC circuit activity resulted in increased reliance on recently executed lever-press durations and impaired contingency reversal, suggesting the recruitment of compensatory mechanisms that resulted in repetitive action control. Our results identify a novel role for lOFC in the of action information to adaptive behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available