4.7 Article

3D concrete printing with cement-coated recycled crumb rubber: Compressive and microstructural properties

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 347, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128507

Keywords

Concrete 3D printing; Recycled crumb rubber; Cement coating; Compressive strength; X-ray micro-CT; Crack propagation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The modification of rubber surface is effective in enhancing the mechanical performance of concrete with recycled rubber particles. However, there is limited research on 3D-printed cementitious materials. This study investigated the correlation between compressive strength and microstructural property of 3D-printed rubberised mortar. The presence of hardened cementitious shells improved the bonding between rubber surface and cement matrix. The anisotropy in compressive strength was influenced by the ratio of cement to rubber.
The modification of a rubber surface, such as cement coating, is an effective method for enhancing the mechanical performance of concrete containing recycled rubber particles. Although this method has been widely investigated for cast concrete, there is limited research on 3D-printed cementitious materials. This study explored the correlation between the compressive strength and microstructural property of 3D-printed rubberised mortar with cement-coated crumb rubber (15 wt% replacement of river sand). Multiple ratios of cement-to-rubber (C/R) were designed to achieve different coating qualities, including C/Rs of 0.25 (CR-0.25), 0.4 (CR-0.4) and 0.55 (CR-0.55). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed the existence of hardened cementitious shells outside the rubber particles, which effectively improved the interfacial bonding between the rubber surface and the cement matrix. The compressive strengths of the printed specimens did not always improve as the ratio of cement to rubber for coating increased. Moreover, the anisotropy in compressive strength was more obvious in the CR-0.4 and CR-0.55, where the strength in the Y (printing) direction was about 7 % higher than that observed in the Z (layer deposition) direction. X-ray micro-computed tomography (mu CT) analysis revealed that the mechanical anisotropy in CR-0.4 and CR-0.55 could be primarily attributed to two factors - pore morphology and pore orientation relative to the external loading direction. For CR-0.25, the rubber-to-matrix interface bonding appeared more critical for the compressive strength. Finally, the printed specimens showed the higher compressive strengths than the cast ones due to the lower fraction of large pores (diameters >= 1 mm).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available