4.7 Article

DEM modeling of biocemented sand: Influence of the cohesive contact surface area distribution and the percentage of cohesive contacts

Journal

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104860

Keywords

Biocementedsand; DEMsimulations; Contactproperties; X-raytomographicdata

Funding

  1. ANR (the project-based funding agency for research in France) [ANR-20-CE22-000301]
  2. IRS Programme - Universite Grenoble Alpes
  3. PEPS-CNRS IIN 2020 (Ingenierie Inspiree par la Nature)
  4. LabEx Tec21 (Investissements d'Avenir) [ANR11 269 LABX0030]
  5. Grenoble INP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study establishes a 3D Discrete Element Method (DEM) model to simulate bio-cemented sand and finds that contact properties play a crucial role in the macroscopic response.
Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) is a recent technique used to reinforce the soil. In the present work, a 3D Discrete Element Method (DEM) model for biocemented sand is set up. It takes into account real contact properties, such as the cohesive contact surface area distribution and the percentage of cemented bonds, which have been computed from 3D synchrotron X-ray images at high resolution of biocemented sand with different amounts of calcite, ranging from 0 to 14.9% in volume (i.e. 19.6% in mass). Triaxial tests under different confining pressures are simulated. The macroscopic response of numerical and physical specimens are compared. Overall, these simulations show that the above contact properties play an important role on the macroscopic response and the proposed numerical model allows to describe with a good accuracy the macroscopic responses of lightly cemented samples (below 4% in volume), whereas it requires future developments to well represent the behavior of medium and highly cemented samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available