4.6 Article

Assessment of a two-step approach for global optimization of mixed-integer polynomial programs using quadratic reformulation

Journal

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107909

Keywords

Deterministic global optimization; Mixed -integer nonlinear optimization; Polynomial optimization; Quadratically-constrained programming; Preprocessing; MINLPLib

Funding

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/W003317/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper revisits the approach of transforming a mixed-integer polynomial program into a mixed-integer quadratically-constrained program, and automates this transformation in a new reformulation engine called CANON. The experimental results demonstrate that the reformulated MIQCPs perform best on the solver GUROBI.
This paper revisits the approach of transforming a mixed-integer polynomial program (MIPOP) into a mixedinteger quadratically-constrained program (MIQCP), in the light of recent progress in global solvers for this latter class of models. We automate this transformation in a new reformulation engine called CANON, alongside preprocessing strategies including local search and bounds tightening. We conduct comparative tests on a collection of 137 MIPOPs gathered from test libraries such as MINLPLib. The solver GUROBI gives the best performance on the reformulated MIQCPs and outperforms the generic global solvers BARON and SCIP. The MIQCP reformulation also improves the performance of SCIP compared to direct MIPOP solution, whereas the performance of BARON is comparable on the original MIPOPs and reformulated MIQCPs. Overall, these results establish the effectiveness of quadratic reformulation for MIPOP global optimization and support its integration into global solvers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available