4.7 Article

QuGIT: A numerical toolbox for Gaussian quantum states

Journal

COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108471

Keywords

Gaussian quantum information; Open quantum dynamics; Continuous variables; Quantum optics; Optomechanics

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeic,oamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. FAPERJ Scholarship [E-26/202.830/2019, E-26/200.270/2020]
  4. CNPq Scholarship [132606/2020-8, 140279/2021-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulating quantum states on classical computers is difficult, but efficient simulation can be achieved for Gaussian quantum states. In this work, a Python toolbox called QuGIT is introduced, which is based on symplectic methods and specializes in efficient simulation of multimode Gaussian states and operations. QuGIT is exact, does not require truncation of Hilbert space, and provides a wide range of Gaussian operations.
Simulating quantum states on a classical computer is hard, typically requiring prohibitive resources in terms of memory and computational power. Efficient simulation, however, can be achieved for certain classes of quantum states, in particular the so-called Gaussian quantum states of continuous variable systems. In this work we introduce QuGIT -a python numerical toolbox based on symplectic methods specialized in efficiently simulating multimode Gaussian states and operations. QuGIT is exact, requiring no truncation of Hilbert space, and provides a wide range of Gaussian operations on arbitrary Gaussian states, including unitaries, partial traces, tensor products, general-dyne measurements, conditional and unconditional dynamics. To illustrate the toolbox, several examples of usage relevant to quantum optics and optomechanics are described. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available