4.7 Article

Evaluation of optical tracking and augmented reality for needle navigation in sacral nerve stimulation

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106991

Keywords

Surgical navigation; Sacral nerve stimulation; Needle guidance; Augmented reality; Tracking systems

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI18/01625, AC20/00102]
  2. Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer and European Regional Development Fund Una manera de hacer Europa (Comunidad de Madrid) [IND2018/TIC-9753]
  3. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes and evaluates two navigation systems for guiding electrode placement in sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) surgeries. Both navigation methods demonstrate better results than the standard clinical method in terms of reducing surgical time, minimizing patient discomfort, and improving surgical outcomes.
Background and objective: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a minimally invasive procedure where an electrode lead is implanted through the sacral foramina to stimulate the nerve modulating colonic and urinary functions. One of the most crucial steps in SNS procedures is the placement of the tined lead close to the sacral nerve. However, needle insertion is very challenging for surgeons. Several x-ray pro-jections are required to interpret the needle position correctly. In many cases, multiple punctures are needed, causing an increase in surgical time and patient's discomfort and pain. In this work we propose and evaluate two different navigation systems to guide electrode placement in SNS surgeries designed to reduce surgical time, minimize patient discomfort and improve surgical outcomes.Methods: We developed, for the first alternative, an open-source navigation software to guide electrode placement by real-time needle tracking with an optical tracking system (OTS). In the second method, we present a smartphone-based AR application that displays virtual guidance elements directly on the af-fected area, using a 3D printed reference marker placed on the patient. This guidance facilitates needle insertion with a predefined trajectory. Both techniques were evaluated to determine which one obtained better results than the current surgical procedure. To compare the proposals with the clinical method, we developed an x-ray software tool that calculates a digitally reconstructed radiograph, simulating the fluoroscopy acquisitions during the procedure. Twelve physicians (inexperienced and experienced users) performed needle insertions through several specific targets to evaluate the alternative SNS guidance methods on a realistic patient-based phantom.Results: With each navigation solution, we observed that users took less average time to complete each insertion (36.83 s and 44.43 s for the OTS and AR methods, respectively) and needed fewer average punctures to reach the target (1.23 and 1.96 for the OTS and AR methods respectively) than following the standard clinical method (189.28 s and 3.65 punctures).Conclusions: To conclude, we have shown two navigation alternatives that could improve surgical out-come by significantly reducing needle insertions, surgical time and patient's pain in SNS procedures. We believe that these solutions are feasible to train surgeons and even replace current SNS clinical proce-dures.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available