4.7 Article

The design and evaluation of bionic porous bone scaffolds in fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107059

Keywords

Bone tissue engineering; Bone scaffold; Fractal dimension; Computational fluid dynamics; Permeability; Flow shear stress

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019QY(Y)0502]
  2. key research and development program of Shaanxi province [2020ZDLSF04-07]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51905438]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [31020190502009]
  5. Innovation Platform of Biofabrication [17SF0 0 02]
  6. Science and Technology Program of Xi'an [21ZCZZHXJS-QCY6-0014]
  7. China Scholarship Council
  8. German Academic Exchange Service [201709920023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to explore an effective modeling method for biomimetic porous bone scaffolds and evaluate their tissue fluid/nutrient mass transport characteristics. By imitating the histomorphological characteristics of human vertebral cancellous bone, the researchers developed a three-dimensional printing method for porous scaffolds. The results of flow characterization and mechanical testing showed that the porous scaffolds had good permeability and mechanical properties, contributing to cell adhesion and migration. The proposed design method offers adjustable parameters for generating diversified functional porous structures to meet specific needs.
Background and objective: At present, there is a lack of efficient modeling methods for bionic artificial bone scaffolds, and the tissue fluid/nutrient mass transport characteristics of bone scaffolds has not been evaluated sufficiently. This study aims to explore an effective and efficient modeling method for biomimetic porous bone scaffolds for biological three-dimensional printing based on the imitation of the histomorphological characteristics of human vertebral cancellous bone. The fluid mass transport and mechanical characteristics of the porous scaffolds were evaluated and compared with those of a human cancellous bone,and the relationship between the geometric parameters (e.g., the size, number, shape of pores and porosity) and the performence of biomimetic porous bone scaffolds are revealed. Methods: The bionic modeling design method proposed in this study considers the biological characteristics of vertebral cancellous tissue and performs imitation and design of vertebrae-like twodimensional slices images.It then reconstructs the slices layer-by-layer to form porous scaffolds with a three-dimensional reconstruction method, similar to computed tomography image reconstruction. By controlling the design parameters, this method can easily realize the formation of plate-like (femoral cancellous bone-like) or rod-like (vertebral cancellous bone-like) porous scaffolds. The flow characterization of porous structures was performed using the computational fluid simulation method. Results: The flow characterization results showed that the permeability of the porous scaffolds and human bone was 10(-8)similar to 10(-9) m(2), and when the porosity of the porous scaffolds was higher than 70%, the permeability was higher than that of human vertebrae with a porosity of 82%. The maximum shear stress of the designed porous scaffolds and human vertebra were less than 0.8Mpa, which was conducive to cell adhesion, cell migration, and cell differentiation. The results of 3D printing and mechanical testing showed good printability and reflected the relationship between the mechanical properties and design parameters. Conclusions: The design method proposed in this study has many controllable parameters, which can be adjusted to generate diversified functional porous structures to meet specific needs, increase the potential of bone scaffold design, and leave room for meeting the new requirements for bone scaffold characteristics in the future. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available