4.7 Article

A comparative study on the ballistic performance of aramid and aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 299, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116048

Keywords

Ballistic resistance; Aramid and aluminium honeycomb core; Energy absorption; Sandwich structure

Funding

  1. SERB/DST under project
  2. [DST/SERB ECR/2016/001440]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the perforation phenomenon of aramid and aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures under high-velocity impacts and compared the impact responses experimentally and numerically. The results showed that the sandwich structure with an aluminium honeycomb core performed better in terms of ballistic limit, while the aramid honeycomb structure was more efficient in terms of energy absorption.
This study investigated the perforation phenomenon of aramid and aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures under high-velocity impacts and compared the impact responses experimentally and numerically. The dimension of the face sheets used was 1 mm in thickness and 220 mm in diameter, and for both the honeycomb cores, the cell thickness of 0.05 mm and the cell size of 3.2 mm was used. Ballistic impact tests were conducted by employing a pneumatic air gun to study damage behavior and failure modes under different impact velocities between 35 m/s and 150 m/s using conical shaped and hemispherical shaped projectiles. Three-dimensional finite element models were implemented in ABAQUS/Explicit to model sandwich panels. The numerical model was validated with experimental data and, subsequently, the numerical study was further extended to study the effects of different geometrical parameters affecting the impact response of sandwich structures. The results showed that for the ballistic limit, sandwich structure having an aluminium honeycomb core performed better than the aramid honeycomb core by 3.09% and 2.5% against conical and hemispherical projectiles, respectively. However, the aramid honeycomb structure was proven to be more efficient than the aluminum honeycomb structure in terms of energy absorption and specific energy absorption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available