4.1 Article

Effects of Transdermal Fentanyl Treatment on Acute Pain and Inflammation in Rats with Adjuvant-induced Monoarthritis

Journal

COMPARATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 320-329

Publisher

AMER ASSOC LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000066

Keywords

CFA; complete Freund adjuvant; TFS; transdermal fentanyl solution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to refine a rat arthritis model by providing analgesia with a transdermal fentanyl solution. The results showed that treatment with transdermal fentanyl solution reduced pain and improved mobility and stance in rats. However, the analgesic effect was transient and accompanied by some side effects.
Eliminating unnecessary pain is an important requirement of performing animal experimentation, including reducing and controlling pain of animals used in pain research. The goal of this study was to refine an adjuvant-induced monoarthritis model in rats by providing analgesia with a transdermal fentanyl solution (TFS). Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats, single-or pair-housed, were injected with 20 mu L of complete Freund adjuvant (CFA) into the left ankle joint. CFA-injected rats treated with a single dose of transdermal fentanyl solution (0.33 or 1 mg/kg) were compared with an untreated CFA-injected group and sham groups that received either no treatment or TFS treatment (1 mg/kg) during 72 h. At the tested doses, TFS reduced mechanical hyperalgesia and improved the mobility, stance, rearing, and lameness scores at 6 h after CFA injection. Joint circumferences were not reduced by TFS treatment, and no significant differences were detected between the 2 doses of TFS, or between single-and pair-housed rats. Treatment with TFS did not appear to interfere with model development and characteristics. However, overall, the analgesic effect was transient, and several opioid-related side effects were observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available