4.7 Article

Laminar burning velocities of pyrrole/air flames: Experimental and comprehensive modeling study

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 245, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112350

Keywords

Pyrrole; Laminar burning velocity; Heat flux method; Detailed kinetic mechanism; Fuel-NOx

Funding

  1. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foun-dation [KAW 2019.0084 COCALD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally determined the adiabatic laminar burning velocities for pyrrole/air flames and conducted a comparison between experimental and computational results. The model performance was improved by modifying a reaction rate constant, and the discrepancies among different models were observed.
Adiabatic laminar burning velocities for pyrrole/air flames were experimentally determined using the heat flux method, over equivalence ratios ranging from 0.6 to 1.3, at atmospheric pressure and initial temperature of 338 K. The detailed kinetic model of the authors was extended by the reactions of pyrrole and its intermediates based on previous theoretical studies and analogies to reactions of similar species. A comparison of new experimental and computational results using the present and the CRECK detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms was conducted and discussed. A modification of the rate constant of reaction C4H5N + OH = H2O + PYRLYL was suggested that dramatically improved the present model performance. The present and the CRECK models were then compared with other experimental targets available in the literature. Some discrepancies between experiments and model predictions and among models themselves were observed. Notwithstanding, the present model showed overall good performances in reproducing laminar burning velocities, speciation data in reactors, and ignition delay times in shock tubes. Sensitivity analyses were performed to delineate the importance of different reaction classes in pyrrole chemistry and to underline possible sources of the observed disagreements. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available