4.6 Article

3D printed geopolymer adsorption sieve for removal of methylene blue and adsorption mechanism

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129235

Keywords

3D Printing; Geopolymer; Methylene blue; First principles; Adsorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51764039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geopolymers are highly promising materials with exceptional ion exchange ability. Through the investigation of a novel direct ink writing (DIW) geopolymer adsorption sieve (GAS) preparation strategy and its adsorption properties and mechanism for methylene blue (MB), it was found that GAS exhibited desirable adsorption rates and characteristics. Furthermore, the adsorption process was influenced by electrostatic action, hydrogen bonds, and electron transfer.
Geopolymers have high application potential due to their outstanding ion exchange ability. A novel direct ink writing (DIW) geopolymer adsorption sieve (GAS) preparation strategy was proposed. The preparation and optimization of DIW inks and the adsorption properties and mechanism of GAS for methylene blue (MB) were systematically investigated by characterization and density functional theory (DFT) calculation. The GASs exhibited desired adsorption rates for MB in both dynamic (83.6% at 200 min) and static (97.1% in 7 days) states. The adsorption kinetic was fitted well by the pseudo-first-order model at the early stage and eventually was transformed to fit well by the pseudo-second-order model and indicated the boundary liquid layer diffusion and intraparticle diffusion were all rate-limiting factors. The exploration of adsorption mechanism confirmed that the adsorption of GAS for MB was affected by the coordination of electrostatic action, hydrogen bonds and electrons transfer. The proposed strategy provides a promising reference for design and preparation of ecofriendly 3D printing adsorbent systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available