4.7 Article

Long-term outcome of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related hemorrhage

Journal

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 1829-1837

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cns.13922

Keywords

cerebral amyloid angiopathy; cerebral small vessel diseases; intracranial hemorrhages; neuroimaging; survival analysis; treatment outcome

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82027802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nearly 50% of CAAH patients achieved favorable outcomes at long-term follow-up. GCS, recurrence of ICH, WML grade, and cerebral atrophy were identified as independent prognostic factors of long-term outcome.
Object The long-term functional outcome of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related hemorrhage (CAAH) patients is unclear. We sought to assess the long-term functional outcome of CAAH and determine the prognostic factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. Methods We enrolled consecutive CAAH patients from 2014 to 2020 in this observational study. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were presented. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with long-term outcome. Results Among the 141 CAAH patients, 76 (53.9%) achieved favorable outcomes and 28 (19.9%) of them died at 1-year follow-up. For the longer-term follow-up with a median observation time of 19.0 (interquartile range, 12.0-26.5) months, 71 (50.4%) patients obtained favorable outcomes while 33 (23.4%) died. GCS on admission (OR, 0.109; 95% CI, 0.021-0.556; p = 0.008), recurrence of ICH (OR, 2923.687; 95% CI, 6.282-1360730.14; p = 0.011), WML grade 3-4 (OR, 31.007; 95% CI, 1.041-923.573; p = 0.047), severe central atrophy (OR, 4220.303; 95% CI, 9.135-1949674.84; p = 0.008) assessed by CT was identified as independent predictors for long-term outcome. Interpretation Nearly 50% of CAAH patients achieved favorable outcomes at long-term follow-up. GCS, recurrence of ICH, WML grade and cerebral atrophy were identified as independent prognostic factors of long-term outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available