4.5 Review

Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Journal

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages 464-505

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0

Keywords

Unloading; Venting; Decompression; VA-ECMO; Percutaneous microaxial pump; Impella; IABP; ECMELLA; Cardiogenic shock

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest are leading causes of mortality in acute cardiovascular care. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as a treatment option for these life-threatening conditions, but in-hospital mortality is still high. Ongoing studies are evaluating whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality in cardiogenic shock. Retrograde aortic flow during VA-ECMO treatment may have detrimental effects, and various venting strategies are being used to mitigate these effects.
Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest contribute pre-dominantly to mortality in acute cardiovascular care. Here, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as an established therapeutic option for patients suffering from these life-threatening entities. VA-ECMO provides temporary circulatory support until causative treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridging strategy to surgical ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation or decision-making. However, in-hospital mortality rate in this treatment population is still around 60%. In the recently published ARREST trial, VA-ECMO treatment lowered mortality rate in patients with ongoing cardiac arrest due to therapy refractory ventricular fibrillation compared to standard advanced cardiac life support in selected patients. Whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality compared to standard of care in cardiogenic shock has to be evaluated in the ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134) and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). As an innate drawback of VA-ECMO treatment, the retrograde aortic flow could lead to an elevation of left ventricular (LV) afterload, increase in LV filling pressure, mitral regurgitation, and elevated left atrial pressure. This may compromise myocardial function and recovery, pulmonary hemodynamics-possibly with concomitant pulmonary congestion and even lung failure-and contribute to poor outcomes in a relevant proportion of treated patients. To overcome these detrimental effects, a multitude of venting strategies are currently engaged for both preventive and emergent unloading. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and structured synopsis of existing venting modalities and their specific hemodynamic characteristics. We discuss in detail the available data on outcome categories and complication rates related to the respective venting option. [GRAPHICS] ,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available