Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Five times sit-to-stand test for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a psychometric study on the effects of arm placements
Lalita Khuna et al.
SPINAL CORD (2020)
Combinatory repair strategy to promote axon regeneration and functional recovery after chronic spinal cord injury
Marc A. DePaul et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2017)
Functional assessments for predicting a risk of multiple falls in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury
Kitiyawadee Srisim et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE (2015)
Ability of walking without a walking device in patients with spinal cord injury as determined using data from functional tests
Puttipong Poncumhak et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE (2014)
Reliability and validity of three functional tests in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury
P. Poncumhak et al.
SPINAL CORD (2013)
The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD
Sarah E. Jones et al.
THORAX (2013)
Reliability and validity of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test for children with cerebral palsy
Tze-Hsuan Wang et al.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION (2012)
A Systematic Review of Cellular Transplantation Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury
Wolfram Tetzlaff et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA (2011)
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011)
Steven C. Kirshblum et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE (2011)
A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study
Joost J. van Middendorp et al.
LANCET (2011)
5-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: Reliability and Validity
Yiqin Mong et al.
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2010)
Sit-to-stand test: Performance and determinants across the age-span
Richard W. Bohannon et al.
ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE (2010)
Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference
Dan Turner et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Global Rating of Change Scales: A Review of Strengths and Weaknesses and Considerations for Design
Steven J. Kamper et al.
JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY (2009)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study
P. L. Ditunno et al.
SPINAL CORD (2008)
A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury
T. Lam et al.
SPINAL CORD (2008)
Muscle force and gait performance: Relationships after spinal cord injury
Markus Wirz et al.
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2006)
Improving walking assessment in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury: responsiveness
H. J. A. van Hedel et al.
SPINAL CORD (2006)
Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: Validity and reliability of 3 walking tests
HJ van Hedel et al.
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2005)
Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people
SR Lord et al.
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES (2002)
Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision
PL Ditunno et al.
SPINAL CORD (2001)
Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations
JA Husted et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2000)
Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study
JF Ditunno et al.
SPINAL CORD (2000)
Share Paper
