4.7 Article

Sarcopenic obesity diagnosis by different criteria mid-to long-term post-bariatric surgery

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1932-1941

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.07.006

Keywords

Sarcopenic obesity; Bariatric surgery; Sarcopenia Obesity Body composition; Physical function

Funding

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development and Ministry of Health (CNPq/MS) [408340/2017-7]
  2. Foundation for Research Support of the Federal District (FAPDF) [0193.001.462/2016]
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [19/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify sarcopenic obesity (SO) in post-RYGB adults using the ESPEN/EASO consensus and compare it with other diagnostic criteria. The results showed a variable prevalence of SO depending on the body composition technique used, with higher prevalence using DXA. There was little agreement between the ESPEN/EASO consensus and other diagnostic criteria.
Background/aims: The aim of this study was to apply the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism/European Association for the Study of Obesity (ESPEN/EASO) consensus to identify sarcopenic obesity (SO) in adults mid to long-term post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) using both dualenergy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Further, this approach was compared to accepted sarcopenia diagnostic criteria (Revised European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People [EWGSOP2] and Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium [SDOC]). Methods: This cross-sectional study included adults >= 2 years post-RYGB surgery. Obesity was diagnosed by excess fat mass (FM) for all diagnostic criteria. Agreement was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa. Results: We evaluated 186 participants (90.9% female, median age 43.9 years, 6.8 years post-surgery), of which 60.2% (BIA), and 83.3% (DXA) had excess FM. Low muscle strength was not identified using absolute handgrip strength. The prevalence of SO by BIA or DXA, respectively, was 7.9% (95%CI 3.9-12.5), and 23.0% (95%CI 17.1-30.3) [ESPEN/EASO SO consensus]; 0.7% (95%CI 0-2.0), and 3.3% (95%CI 0.7-5.9) [EWGSOP2]; and 27.0% (95%CI 19.7-34.2), and 30.3% (95%CI 23.0-37.5) [SDOC]. Agreement between the ESPEN/EASO SO consensus and other diagnostic criteria was none to slight using DXA: EWGSOP2 k = 0.19; 95% CI 0.04-0.34, or SDOC k = 0.16; 95% CI -0.01-0.32. Moderate agreement was observed within the ESPEN/EASO SO consensus for BIA and DXA (k - 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.60). Conclusions: This is the first study to explore the prevalence of SO using the ESPEN/EASO criteria. We identified a high but variable prevalence of SO in post-bariatric surgery patients (7.9e23.0%), depending on the body composition technique used; prevalence was higher using DXA. Little agreement was observed for the diagnosis of SO using the three diagnostic criteria. Future studies are needed to explore the relationship between SO identified by the ESPEN/EASO consensus and health status/outcomes. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available