4.6 Article

Plasticity of visual evoked potentials in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 220-227

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.08.009

Keywords

Visual evoked potentials; Neurofibromatosis type 1; Cortical plasticity

Funding

  1. Department of Neuroscience
  2. Department of Clinical Genetics
  3. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology
  4. Department of Psychiatry of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates visual cortical plasticity in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) using visual evoked potentials (VEPs). The results show that individuals with NF1 may have reduced visual cortical plasticity compared to controls. These findings contribute to the assessment of using neurophysiological outcome measures in intervention studies of cognitive deficits among NF1 patients.
Objective: The inability to properly process visual information has been frequently associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Based on animal studies, the cause of cognitive disabilities in NF1 is hypothesized to arise from decreased synaptic plasticity. Visual cortical plasticity in humans can be investigated by studying visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in response to visual stimulation. Methods: VEP plasticity was assessed by measuring the increase of the peak amplitudes Cl, P1, and N1 induced by 10-min modulation of checkerboard reversals in 22 adult NF1 patients and 30 controls. VEP signals were recorded pre-modulation, during modulation, and at 2, 7, 12, 17, 22, 27 min postmodulation. Results: The P1 amplitude increased significantly comparing post-modulation to pre-modulation in the control group. This potentiation was not observed in the NF1 group. Conclusions: Visual cortical plasticity could be measured using VEPs in response to visual stimulation in the control group. Individuals with NF1 may have reduced visual cortical plasticity, as indicated by their non-potentiated response to VEP induction. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to high inter-subject variability. Significance: The present study contributes to an improved assessment of the feasibility for using neurophysiological outcome measures in intervention studies of cognitive deficits among patients with NFl. (C) 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available