Journal
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages E26-E33Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac687
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2; hospital admission; death; molnupiravir; nirmatrelvir; ritonavir
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A study on community patients in Hong Kong found that the use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization, while molnupiravir did not show this effect.
In this territory-wide cohort of 93 883 community patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Hong Kong, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a reduced risk (21%) of hospitalization, whereas molnupiravir was not, after balancing patients' demographic characteristics, comorbidities, previous hospitalization records, and background complete vaccination rate. Background We examined the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in reducing hospitalization and deaths in a real-world cohort of nonhospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods This was a territory-wide retrospective cohort study in Hong Kong. Nonhospitalized COVID-19 patients who attended designated outpatient clinics between 16 February and 31 March 2022 were identified. Patients hospitalized on the day of the first clinic appointment or used both oral antivirals were excluded. The primary endpoint was hospitalization. The secondary endpoint was a composite of intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation use, and/or death. Results Of 93 883 patients, 83 154 (88.6%), 5808 (6.2%), and 4921 (5.2%) were oral antiviral nonusers, molnupiravir users, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users, respectively. Compared with nonusers, oral antiviral users were older and had more comorbidities, lower complete vaccination rate, and more hospitalizations in the previous year. Molnupiravir users were older and had more comorbidities, lower complete vaccination rate, and more hospitalizations in the previous year than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users. At a median follow-up of 30 days, 1931 (2.1%) patients were hospitalized and 225 (0.2%) patients developed the secondary endpoint. After propensity score weighting, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use (weighted hazard ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.95; P = .011) but not molnupiravir use (weighted hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 0.99-1.39; P = .062) was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization than nonusers. The use of molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was not associated with a lower risk of the secondary endpoint as compared with nonusers. Conclusion Use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir but not molnupiravir was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization in real-world nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available