Journal
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 879-908Publisher
ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01199-7
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- University of New England International Postgraduate Research Award scholarship (UNE IPRA)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the measurement properties of medication adherence patient-reported outcome measures (MA-PROMs) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and identify the most suitable MA-PROM for use in clinical practice or future research. The review found a lack of sufficient content validity evidence for all MA-PROMs in patients with CVD. Only eight MA-PROMs were classified in the highest recommendation category and had sufficient content validity and internal consistency. Further validation studies are needed for 28 MA-PROMs in the second recommendation category. Four MA-PROMs were not recommended for use in CVD patients. From the eight MA-PROMs in the highest recommendation category, ARMS and ARMS-7 were selected as the most suitable for use in patients with CVD.
Background and Objective Several medication adherence patient-reported outcome measures (MA-PROMs) are available for use in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, little evidence is available on the most suitable MA-PROM to measure medication adherence in patients with CVD. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the measurement properties of MA-PROMs for patients with CVD and identify the most suitable MA-PROM for use in clinical practice or future research in patients with CVD. Methods An electronic search of nine databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest Health and Medicine, Cochrane Library, PsychInfo, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) was conducted to identify studies that have reported on at least one of the measurement properties of MA-PROMs in patients with CVD. The methodological quality of the studies included in the systematic review was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results A total of 40 MA-PROMs were identified in the 84 included studies. This review found there is a lack of moderate-to-high quality evidence of sufficient content validity for all MA-PROMs for patients with CVDs. Only eight MA-PROMs were classified in COSMIN recommendation category A. They exhibited sufficient content validity with very low-quality evidence, and moderate-to-high quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency. The 28 MA-PROMs that meet the requirements for COSMIN recommendation category 'B' require further validation studies. Four MA-PROMs including Hill-Bone Compliance Medication Scale (HBMS), the five-item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), Maastricht Utrecht Adherence in Hypertension (MUAH), and MUAH-16 have insufficient results with high quality evidence for at least one measurement property and consequently are not recommended for use in patients with CVD. Two MA-PROMs (Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale [ARMS] and ARMS-7) are comprehensive and have moderate to high quality evidence for four sufficient measurement properties. Conclusion From the eight MA-PROMs in COSMIN recommendation category A, ARMS and ARMS-7 were selected as the most suitable MA-PROMs for use in patients with CVD. They are the most comprehensive with be best quality evidence to support their use in clinical practice and research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available