4.5 Review

Global declarations on electric vehicles, carbon life cycle and Nash equilibrium

Journal

CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 21-34

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-022-02399-7

Keywords

Electric vehicle; Carbon life cycle; Universal declaration; Carbon emission; Electricity generation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses game theory to analyze the electricity carbon life cycle in leading EV countries, and finds that the production and use of electric vehicles in some countries become a new source of carbon emissions due to the emission of greenhouse gases from their electricity sources. Therefore, countries with unclean electricity sources should reconsider their plans for producing and using EVs.
Universal environmental policies adopt strategies that enhance and encourage the production and usage of electric vehicles (EVs). Universal cooperation is evident in the framework of agreements or protocols so as to successfully lead countries towards the predetermined goals. The question is whether this trend can reduce global warming or CO2 emissions worldwide. By adopting game theory, this study analyses electricity carbon life cycle in leading EV countries. Results show that although the spread of EVs in Europe and the USA can mitigate carbon emissions, the production and use of electric vehicles in some countries, such as China and India, become a new source of such emissions. This reverse effect is due to the emission of greenhouse gases from electricity sources in these countries. Game theory also suggests that countries with unclean electricity sources should reconsider their plans to produce and use EVs. This study confirms that although carbon emission and global warming are global problems, regional and local policies can be substituted with a single comprehensive approach for an effective means of CO2 emission reduction. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available