4.5 Article

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Acute Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Nonrandomized On-Treatment Comparison With His Bundle Pacing and Biventricular Pacing

Shengjie Wu et al.

Summary: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) appears to be a promising method for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), showing similar improvements in symptoms and left ventricular function compared with His bundle pacing (HBP) but more significant than biventricular pacing (BVP).

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2021)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

The evolution of cardiac resynchronization therapy and an introduction to conduction system pacing: a conceptual review

Bengt Herweg et al.

Summary: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is the only known non-pharmacologic heart failure therapy that improves cardiac function, functional capacity, and survival while decreasing cardiac workload and hospitalization rates. However, limitations of conventional CRT include difficulties with myocardial scar, fibrosis, and inability to effectively simulate diseased tissue. Studies have shown that endocardial stimulation is more effective than epicardial stimulation in closer proximity to the specialized conduction system.

EUROPACE (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients

Luuk I. B. Heckman et al.

Summary: The study shows that both LVSP and LBBP significantly improve ventricular dyssynchrony compared to RVSP, bringing values close to normal ventricular activation. Patients with left bundle branch capture during LBBP demonstrate the most significant decrease in QRS area.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Left bundle branch pacing compared to left ventricular septal myocardial pacing increases interventricular dyssynchrony but accelerates left ventricular lateral wall depolarization

Karol Curila et al.

Summary: The study compared the effects of different physiological pacing techniques on ventricular depolarization, showing that nonselective left bundle branch pacing resulted in greater interventricular electrical dyssynchrony, while left ventricular septal myocardial pacing caused prolonged lateral wall depolarization.

HEART RHYTHM (2021)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Short-Term Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization by Left Ventricular Septal Pacing

Floor C. W. M. Salden et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2020)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

The efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: A matched case-control study

Yao Wang et al.

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2020)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Weijian Huang et al.

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2020)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

How to deliver personalized cardiac resynchronization therapy through the precise measurement of the acute hemodynamic response: Insights from the iSpot trial

Matthew J. Shun-Shin et al.

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2019)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing

Weijian Huang et al.

HEART RHYTHM (2019)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Left Bundle Branch Pacing JACC Review Topic of the Week

Shu Zhang et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2019)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Hemodynamic Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Should We Aim for dP/dtmax or Stroke Work?

Alwin Zweerink et al.

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2019)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

His Resynchronization Versus Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Ahran D. Arnold et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2018)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Impact of a Novel Adaptive Optimization Algorithm on 30-Day Readmissions Evidence From the Adaptive CRT Trial

Randall C. Starling et al.

JACC-HEART FAILURE (2015)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Baseline vectorcardiography as a predictor of invasively determined acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Thomas Schau et al.

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY (2013)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Persistent Hemodynamic Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Disease Progression in Advanced Heart Failure

Wilfried Mullens et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2009)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial

Eugene S. Chung et al.

CIRCULATION (2008)