4.4 Article

Numerical Study on the Vertical Water Exit of A Cylinder with Cavity

Journal

CHINA OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 734-742

Publisher

CHINA OCEAN PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s13344-022-0065-0

Keywords

water exit; cavity; CFD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method to numerically calculate the vapor-liquid-gas flow during the water exit of a high-speed cylinder, it was found that cavity collapse during water exit causes strong pressure fluctuation on the cylinder, and the effects of different initial velocities on pressure distribution and drag characteristics were investigated.
When a high-speed body with cavity passes through water-air free surface and exits water, its mechanical environment and dynamic characteristics change significantly due to the great difference in density and viscosity between water and air. With focusing on this problem, the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method is applied to perform numerical calculation on the process of this vapor-liquid-gas flow during the water exit of a high-speed cylinder, with the Volume of Fraction (VOF) multiphase flow interface-capturing techniques and the overset grid technology. After the verification and validation of the CFD model through mesh convergence study and a water-entry experiment, cavity evolution and flow characteristics including pressure and velocity distribution during the water exit are analyzed. The effects of different initial velocities on the pressure distribution and drag characteristics of the cylinder are investigated. Calculated results show that the cavity collapse during water exit causes strong pressure fluctuation on the cylinder; when the cylinder exits water enveloped in a supercavity, the pressure distribution on its wall surface and surrounding water region is relatively uniform, and the drag changes gently, and thus the cylinder has good motion stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available