Journal
CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 312, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137028
Keywords
Avoidance; Colonisation; Multigenerational; Reproduction; SSRI
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the effects of fluoxetine on Daphnia magna, finding that it may have harmful effects on survival, behavior, and reproduction. It was revealed that fluoxetine did not have multigenerational effects on reproduction and behavior at environmentally relevant concentrations, but showed lethal effects at higher concentrations. Additionally, fluoxetine concentrations were found to promote the reproduction of D. magna. This study highlights the potential hazards for aquatic biota due to the increasing use of fluoxetine.
Fluoxetine, a common pharmaceutical used as an antidepressant, is already considered potentially hazardous to biota due to its increasing use and detection in European, North American, and Asian rivers. We studied the effects of fluoxetine on Daphnia magna, as we hypothesized that fluoxetine might have harmful effects, short and long-term, at different levels: survival, behaviour, and reproduction (offspring production). We applied two different approaches: (i) a scenario at environmentally relevant concentrations (0.1-1.0 mu g/L) and (ii) a scenario simulating a future worsening of contamination (1-800 mu g/L) until the reach of lethal concentrations. In the former, we examined whether there are multigenerational effects on reproduction and on the avoidance/colo-nisation behaviour in previously exposed populations. In the latter, three responses were assessed: survival, avoidance behaviour and reproduction. We did not detect differences in the reproduction output of D. magna among the treatments over the three generations examined. Irrespective of the multigenerational treatment, D. magna colonised the environments with fluoxetine in a similar way. In the second scenario, we determined the lethal concentration for 50% of the population (96 h-LC50 = 365 mu g/L), which, in spite of the toxic effect, was attractive to organisms during the avoidance tests (24 h); in fact, D. magna were attracted (no repellence) even to the highest concentrations of fluoxetine tested (800 mu g/L). Lastly, in a 21-day chronic toxicity test the repro-duction output of D. magna increased with higher concentrations of fluoxetine. This effect might be related to the fact that the organisms in the contaminated treatment began their first reproduction earlier, when compared to that in the control treatments. In conclusion, this study discusses an identified hazard for aquatic biota due to the fluoxetine attraction effect and a predictive assessment of the consequences expected if its indiscriminate use increases.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available