4.6 Article

Butterfly-Shaped Nanographenes with Excellent Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties: The Synergy of B/N and Azulene

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202203110

Keywords

azulene; boron and nitrogen doping; butterfly-shaped nanographene; nonlinear optics; synergy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a method of changing the molecular structure by doping B and N in nanographene was designed to achieve strong NLO responses. This doping strategy provides a new approach for the design of carbon-based functional materials, and the NLO properties of these materials under external fields could inspire future experimental exploration.
Azulene, a simple polar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon with connected electron donor and acceptor (DA), ignites the hope of designing second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) molecular materials from pure nonpolar carbon nanomaterials. In this work, a butterfly-shaped nanographene (pi-DA-pi) was designed by incorporating azulene between two coronenes. One more electron in a N atom or one electron fewer in a B atom with respect to a C atom can polarize charge distribution in carbon nanomaterials, and further doping of B and N in the designed butterfly-shaped nanographene changes the system from pi-DA-pi to D-pi-A, leading to strong NLO responses. For example, the largest static first hyperpolarizability even reaches 173.89x10(-30) esu per heavy atom. The synergetic role of B, N and azulene in the nanographene is scrutinized, and such a doping strategy is found to provide an effective means for the design of carbon-based functional materials. The strong second-order NLO responses of these butterfly-shaped carbon-based nanographenes under external fields, for example, sum frequency generation and difference frequency generation, could inspire future experimental exploration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available