4.7 Article

cyy260 suppresses the proliferation, migration and tumor growth of osteosarcoma by targeting PDGFR-β signaling pathway

Journal

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
Volume 367, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110200

Keywords

Osteosarcoma; PDGFR-?; cyy260; Inhibitor; Antitumor

Funding

  1. National Natural ScienceFoundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
  3. [81973168]
  4. [LZ22H300002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that cyy260 has an anti-tumor effect in osteosarcoma by suppressing PDGFR-beta and its downstream pathway, inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and inhibiting tumor migration. Cyy260 also suppressed tumor cell growth in vivo and exhibited low toxicity.
Osteosarcoma (OS) is a group of malignant tumors with high rates of malignancy and metastasis. OS most commonly affects adolescents and young individuals. However, owing to the lack of effective targeted treat-ments, the 5-year survival rate for OS is still around 20%. Thus, it is essential to develop effective drugs with low toxicity for OS treatment. In the present study, we investigated the antitumor effect and underlying mechanism of cyy260 in OS via suppressing PDGFR-beta and its downstream pathway. We demonstrated that cyy260 inhibits OS cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis via inducing DNA damage and causing cell cycle arrest. More importantly, cyy260 also significantly inhibits tumor migration. Further analysis of molecular mechanisms confirmed that PDGFR-beta and its downstream AKT, STAT3, and ERK were involved in the cyy260-mediated antitumor effect. Analysis of subcutaneously transplanted tumors in mice showed that cyy260 suppressed tumor cell growth and exhibited low toxicity in vivo. Collectively, these findings proved that cyy260 could serve as a promising PDGFR-beta inhibitor for the treatment of OS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available