4.6 Article

Mass transfer modeling and sensitivity study of low-temperature Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 259, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.117774

Keywords

Fischer-Tropsch; Mass transfer; Phase equilibrium; PC-SAFT; Peng-Robinson; Henry?s law

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study theoretically investigates the mass transfer in an industrial-scale Fischer-Tropsch slurry bubble column reactor. Three different driving forces for mass transfer are proposed and the effects of carbon chain length, pressure, and temperature on conversion level are analyzed. The mass transfer models based on Henry's law and phase equilibrium are compared, with the latter being capable of predicting the thermodynamics of additional phase formation.
An industrial-scale Fischer-Tropsch (FT) slurry bubble column reactor (SBCR) was theoretically investigated, emphasizing the mass transfer between the gas and slurry phases. In this endeavor, three different driving forces for mass transfer (the impetus behind the motion of species mass) were proposed: one based on Henry's law and two based on rigorous phase equilibrium. The mass transfer model based on Henry's law relies on the solvent, which here was specified as a paraffin with carbon chain length in the range of 16-36. The conversion level was found to increase with increasing carbon chain length. On the other hand, the mass transfer models based on phase equilibrium do not require identifying a solvent, which is advantageous for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) where the large number of compounds render the solvent a vague and ambiguous concept. Here, the phase equilibrium was computed with the Peng-Robinson (PR) and the perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT) equations of state (EoSs); however, the proposed concept is generic and easily extended to other EoSs and activity coefficient-based models. With all three mass transfer formulations, the conversion level increased with increasing pressure and decreased with increasing temperature. Furthermore, increasing the catalyst loading did not increase the conversion level, whereas increasing the mass transfer coefficient did increase the conversion level. It was concluded that the reactor operates in the mass transfer limited regime rather than the kinetically limited regime. The mass transfer model based on Henry's law was the least computationally expensive to evaluate, followed by the PR and PC-SAFT EoSs in increasing order; however, the mass transfer models based on the PR and PC-SAFT EoSs are capable of predicting the thermodynamic spontaneity of forming additional phases, which Henry's law is incapable of.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available