4.2 Article

Comprehensive study on gluten composition and baking quality of winter wheat

Journal

CEREAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 142-155

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cche.10606

Keywords

bread; gliadin; glutenin; glutenin macropolymer; starch gelatinization; wheat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study comprehensively analyzed 82 wheat flours, especially in terms of gluten composition. The results showed that baking quality of flour is the result of a complex combination of different parameters, and there is no significant correlation between protein composition and loaf volume.
Background and Objectives Protein and gluten content and composition are important for the baking quality of wheat flours. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive characterization of 82 wheat flours to analyze the influence of protein composition on rheological and baking quality parameters. Findings Protein composition, starch gelatinization behavior, as well as rheological (microfarinograph, gluten aggregation, extensibility), and baking parameters were determined. The correlation matrix showed no significant correlations between gluten composition and loaf volume. Parameters of the gluten aggregation test allowed a prediction of gluten, gliadin, and glutenin content with an absolute root mean square error of cross validation of 7.5, 6.0, and 3.2 mg/g, respectively, using partial least squares regression. Starch gelatinization temperature had an effect on gluten aggregation. Conclusions The gluten aggregation test was suitable to predict gluten, gliadin, and glutenin content. The lack of correlations between protein composition and loaf volume indicates that baking quality is the result of a complex combination of different parameters. Significance and Novelty Our study is the first to comprehensively analyze 82 wheat flours, especially in terms of gluten composition. We show that flour blends can reach excellent baking quality even if quality indicators like crude protein or extensibility are comparatively low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available