4.7 Article

Sodium sulphate resistance of geopolymer mortar produced using ground ferronickel slag with fly ash

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 2765-2773

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.258

Keywords

Geopolymers; Ground ferronickel slag; Mechanical properties; Microstructure; Sulphate attack

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the durability of geopolymer mortar made from ground ferronickel slag (GFNS) and fly ash (FA) after being immersed in 5% sodium sulphate solution for 1.5 years. The results showed that the compressive strength of the samples increased after the immersion. The geopolymer mortar containing 75% GFNS exhibited the highest compressive strength after exposure to sulphate. The presence of stable sodium magnesium alumino-silicate hydrate (NMASH) product was attributed to the high strength of the FA-GFNS geopolymer.
This study investigated the durability of geopolymer mortar made from ground ferronickel slag (GFNS) with fly ash (FA) after immersion in 5% sodium sulphate solution for 1.5 years. An increase of compressive strength was found after immersion of the samples in sodium sulphate solution. The mortar containing 75% GFNS was found to have the highest compressive strength after sulphate exposure. The high strength of FA-GFNS geopolymer is ascribed to the presence of stable sodium magnesium alumino-silicate hydrate (NMASH) product. The expansions of geopolymer mortars after immersion in sulphate solution were well below the value recommended by the American Concrete Institute (ACI). Microstructural analysis confirmed the absence of expansive gypsum or ettringite in geopolymer mortar after sodium sulphate solution exposure. Though all the samples showed good stability against sulphate exposure, the NMASH gel and the lower calcium content of GFNS made the FA-GFNS blended geopolymer less susceptible to sulphate attack compared to the 100% FA geopolymer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available