4.7 Article

Dense LiF microwave dielectric ceramics with near-zero linear shrinkage during sintering

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 48, Issue 19, Pages 28463-28470

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.160

Keywords

LiF; Microwave dielectric ceramics; Densification; Shrinkage; Cold sintering

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A20243]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0406301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, dense LiF ceramics were prepared using room-temperature cold sintering. The increase in compacting pressure and relative density greatly improved the relative density, microstructural homogeneity, and microwave dielectric properties of the ceramics. This has significant implications for enhancing the performance and applications of the ceramics.
In order to improve the densification of LiF ceramics, LiF green compacts were prepared by room-temperature cold sintering through uniaxially pressing the mixture of LiF powder and water. With increasing the compacting pressure from 100 to 800 MPa, the relative density of mechanically robust LiF compacts increased dramatically from 69.4% to 92.4%, which was attributed to the plastic deformation and dissolution-precipitation mechanism with the aid of high pressure and water. The relative density and microstructural homogeneity could be further improved by sintering the compacts at 825 ?C, and the highest relative density of 95.4% was obtained in LiF ceramic with the compacting pressure of 800 MPa, which also exhibited the optimum microwave dielectric properties of epsilon(r) = 8.53, Qf =118,400 GHz and tau(f)=-154 ppm/?C. Moreover, the linear shrinkage of LiF ceramics during sintering could be significantly reduced by increasing the compacting pressure and relative density of the green compacts, and it was as low as 1.1% for the compacting pressure of 800 MPa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available