4.7 Article

Protonic SOFCs with a novel La0.4K0.1Ca0.5MnO3-? cathode

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 48, Issue 23, Pages 35599-35605

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.273

Keywords

La0; 1Ca0; 5MnO3-?; Proton conductor; Solid oxide fuel cell; Cathode

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Hundred Youth Talents Program of Hunan
  3. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Edu-cation Institutions of China
  4. [51972183]
  5. [17KJB430033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The La0.4K0.1Ca0.5MnO3-delta (LKCM) material was successfully prepared by partially replacing La cations with K cations in La0.5Ca0.5MnO3-delta (LCM). Doping K triggered the cathode activity of the material, and LKCM showed more oxygen vacancies and improved catalytic activity than LCM. Therefore, a proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell (H-SOFC) using an LKCM cathode exhibited better performance than the LCM cell.
The La0.4K0.1Ca0.5MnO3-delta (LKCM) material has been successfully prepared by partially replacing La cations with K cations in La0.5Ca0.5MnO3-delta (LCM). The relatively low calcination temperature retained K cations in the lattice. Doping K triggered the cathode activity of the material, and LKCM showed more oxygen vacancies and improved catalytic activity than LCM. Therefore, a proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell(H-SOFC) using an LKCM cathode exhibited better performance than the LCM cell. Despite the high basicity of K, the incorporation of 10 mol.% K into LCM did not significantly change the chemical stability of the material. LKCM still presented good stability against CO2. First-principles calculations revealed the mechanism for good stability. Further optimizations of the cell structure led to an impressively high fuel cell performance of 1317 mW cm-2 at 700 degrees C for the LKCM cell, which was larger than most H-SOFCs using Mn-based cathodes in literature reports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available