4.7 Article

Polarized Raman spectroscopy for determining the orientation of cellulose microfibrils in wood cell wall

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 75-85

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04915-w

Keywords

Cellulose microfibrils orientation; Polarized Raman spectroscopy; Wood cell wall

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel strategy is proposed to analyze the orientation of cellulose microfibrils without prior knowledge. The direction of cellulose microfibrils can be determined by the polarization-dependent Raman signal intensity. This strategy was successfully used to study variations in molecular orientation in the cell wall of balsa wood.
It is well established that wood cellulose has highly ordered architecture at scales from a few nanometres to several microns in wood cell wall. Its preferred orientation could be in-situ investigated by polarized Raman spectroscopy. However, the technique is currently underused due to the challenges in sample preparation, instrumentation access and availability of prediction models. Here, a novel strategy is proposed to analyse the microfibril orientation without requiring prior knowledge of the fiber alignment. We derive the mathematical dependence between the incident light polarization angle and the intensity of Raman signal. An updated prediction model of microfibril orientation was thus constructed to replace the previous empirical functions. The problems of degradation and burning were addressed by adjusting the laser power and shortening the acquisition time. The orientation direction of cellulose microfibrils can be determined by the polarization-dependent 1096 cm(-1) intensity without rotating sample. The strategy was successfully used to study the variations in molecular orientation throughout a cell wall of balsa wood. It was found that the cellulose microfibrils are arranged spirally to form the cell wall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available