4.5 Article

Molecular and Regenerative Characterization of Repair and Non-repair Schwann Cells

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 2165-2178

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-022-01295-4

Keywords

Schwann cell; Peripheral nerve injury; Axon regeneration; Molecular profile

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that repair Schwann cells (RSCs), derived from non-RSCs after injury, have enhanced adherent properties and a greater capability to promote neurite outgrowth and axon regeneration compared to non-RSCs. Transcriptome analyses also reveal distinct molecular characteristics between RSCs and non-RSCs. These findings provide a basis for understanding the mechanisms of SC mediated repair after peripheral nerve injury.
Although evidence has accumulated to indicate that Schwann cells (SCs) differentiate into repair SCs (RSCs) upon injury and that the unique phenotype of these cells allow them to provide support for peripheral nerve regeneration, the details of the RSCs are not fully understood. The findings of the current study indicate that the RSCs have enhanced adherent properties and a greater capability to promote neurite outgrowth and axon regeneration after peripheral nerve injury, compared to the non-RSCs. Further, transcriptome analyses have demonstrated that the molecular signature of the RSCs is distinctly different from that of the non-RSCs. The RSCs upregulate a group of genes that are related to inflammation, repair, and regeneration, whereas non-RSCs upregulate genes related to myelin maintenance, Notch, and aging. These findings indicate that the RSCs have markedly different cellular, regenerative, and molecular characteristics compared to the non-RSCs, even though the RSCs were just derived from non-RSCs upon injury, thus providing the basis for understanding the mechanisms related to SC mediated repair after peripheral nerve injury. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available