4.8 Article

Nociceptor neurons direct goblet cells via a CGRP-RAMP1 axis to drive mucus production and gut barrier protection

Journal

CELL
Volume 185, Issue 22, Pages 4190-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chuan Wu (NIH)
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01DK127257, T32 DK007447, R35GM142683, P30DK034854]
  3. Food Allergy Science Initiative
  4. Kenneth Rainin Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroepithelial crosstalk plays a critical role in gut physiology, particularly in mediating gut barrier protection. Sensory neurons communicate with intestinal goblet cells to promote mucus secretion and gut protection via the CGRP-Ramp1 pathway. Additionally, commensal microbes can activate nociceptors to regulate CGRP release.
Neuroepithelial crosstalk is critical for gut physiology. However, the mechanisms by which sensory neurons communicate with epithelial cells to mediate gut barrier protection at homeostasis and during inflammation are not well understood. Here, we find that Nav1.8+CGRP+ nociceptor neurons are juxtaposed with and signal to intestinal goblet cells to drive mucus secretion and gut protection. Nociceptor ablation led to decreased mucus thickness and dysbiosis, while chemogenetic nociceptor activation or capsaicin treatment induced mucus growth. Mouse and human goblet cells expressed Ramp1, receptor for the neuropeptide CGRP. Nociceptors signal via the CGRP-Ramp1 pathway to induce rapid goblet cell emptying and mucus secretion. Notably, commensal microbes activated nociceptors to control homeostatic CGRP release. In the absence of nociceptors or epithelial Ramp1, mice showed increased epithelial stress and susceptibility to colitis. Conversely, CGRP administration protected nociceptor-ablated mice against colitis. Our findings demon-strate a neuron-goblet cell axis that orchestrates gut mucosal barrier protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available