4.7 Review

Perspectives on evaluating health effects of starch: Beyond postprandial glycemic response

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119621

Keywords

Health effects; Digestion property; Glucose kinetics; Insulin response; Gut hormones

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31722040, 31771935]
  2. National Firstclass Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology [JUFSTR20180204]
  3. Jiangsu province Collaborative Innovation Center of Food Safety and Quality Control industry development program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starch is an important carbohydrate in the human diet and is associated with human health. Besides glycemic response, studies have shown that glucose kinetics, insulin response, and gut hormones release play critical roles in determining the health effects of starch.
Starch is an important dietary carbohydrate in the human diet and is greatly associated with human health. The health effects of starch are classically evaluated by postprandial glycemic response. However, glycemic response is the test result of blood glucose level and sometimes fails to perfectly describe the health effects exerted by starch. Therefore, other factors, besides glycemic response, merit consideration. Herein, we endeavor to provide some insights into the description of health effects exerted by starch. For this purpose, we summarize advances in recent studies to support the crucial roles of glucose kinetics, insulin response, and gut hormones release. A moderate postprandial insulin response and an enhanced release of several specific gut hormones are critical characteristics of a healthier starch, such as those slowly digested till the distal ileum. It is also hoped that further studies can develop feasible methods to produce tailor-made starches with individualized health effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available