4.5 Article

UBE2T promotes glioblastoma malignancy through ubiquitination-mediated degradation of RPL6

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 521-532

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.15604

Keywords

GBM; RPL6; UBE2T; ubiquitination

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that UBE2T promotes the malignant progression of GBM cells through ubiquitination-mediated degradation of RPL6, regardless of the mutation status of p53. Inhibiting the expression of RPL6 can decrease the expression of wild-type p53 and enhance the gain-of-function of mutant p53. Knockdown of UBE2T significantly suppresses tumor growth in mouse models of GBM.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive malignant glioma. Due to patients' poor prognosis, it is of great clinical significance to determine new targets that may improve GBM treatment. In the present study, we showed that ubiquitin (Ub)-conjugating enzyme E2T (UBE2T) was significantly overexpressed in GBM and could promote proliferation, invasion, and inhibit apoptosis of GBM cells. Mechanistically, UBE2T functioned as the Ub enzyme of ribosomal protein L6 (RPL6) and induced the ubiquitination and degradation of RPL6 in an E3 ligase-independent manner through direct modification by K48-linked polyubiquitination, thus contributing to the malignant progression of GBM cells. Furthermore, inhibiting the expression of RPL6 by UBE2T could not only reduce the expression of wild-type p53, but also enhance the gain-of-function of mutant p53. Moreover, knockdown of UBE2T in LN229 cells obviously suppressed tumor growth in LN229 xenograft mouse models. Collectively, our study demonstrated that UBE2T promotes GBM malignancy through ubiquitination-mediated degradation of RPL6 regardless of the p53 mutation status. It will provide new candidates for molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets for clinical application in GBM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available