4.4 Article

Endoscopic Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer according to Type 2 Diabetes Status

Journal

CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 847-856

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0305

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [P01 CA87969, U01 CA186107, P01 CA55075, UM1 CA167552, U01 CA167552, K24 DK098311, R01 CA137178, R01 CA202704, R01 CA176726, K99 CA215314, R00 CA215314, U01 CA261961, R01 CA263776, R35 CA197735, R01 CA151993]
  2. American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar Grant [MRSG-17-220-01-NEC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current recommendations for colorectal cancer screening do not take into account the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study found that the absolute benefit of endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer prevention may be higher for individuals with T2D compared to those without T2D. Additionally, individuals with T2D reached the threshold risk level for colorectal cancer at a younger age than those without T2D, suggesting the consideration of earlier endoscopic screening in individuals with T2D.
Current recommendations for colorectal cancer screen-ing have not accounted for type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. It remains unknown whether the colorectal cancer-preventive benefit of endoscopic screening and the recommended age for screening initiation differ by T2D. Among 166,307 women (Nurses' Health Study I and II, 1988-2017) and 42,875 men (Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 1988-2016), endo-scopic screening and T2D diagnosis were biennially updated. We calculated endoscopic screening-associated hazard ratios (HR) and absolute risk reductions (ARR) for colorectal cancer incidence and mortality according to T2D, and age-specific colorectal cancer incidence according to T2D. During a medi-an of 26 years of follow-up, we documented 3,457 colorectal cancer cases and 1,129 colorectal cancer deaths. Endoscopic screening was associated with a similar HR of colorectal cancer incidence in the T2D and non-T2D groups (P-multiplicative interaction = 0.57). In contrast, the endoscopic screening-associated ARR for colorectal cancer incidence was higher in the T2D group (2.36%; 95% CI, 1.55%-3.13%) than in the non-T2D group (1.73%; 95% CI, 1.29%-2.16%; P-additive interaction = 0.01). Individuals without T2D attained a 10-year cumulative risk of 0.35% at the benchmark age of 45 years, whereas those with T2D reached this threshold risk level at the age of 36 years. Similar results were observed for colorectal cancer mortality. In conclusion, the absolute benefit of endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer pre-vention may be substantially higher for individuals with T2D compared with those without T2D. Although T2D is com-paratively rare prior to the fifth decade of life, the rising incidence of young-onset T2D and heightened colorectal cancer risk associated with T2D support the consideration of earlier endoscopic screening in individuals with T2D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available