4.5 Article

Extended barycentric rational schemes for functions of singularities

Journal

CALCOLO
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10092-022-00480-7

Keywords

Barycentric rational interpolation; Scaled transformations; Algebraic singularity; Highly oscillatory integral; Levin method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12271528]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2020zzts031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, two kinds of extended barycentric rational schemes for approximating functions of singularities are proposed. The schemes achieve higher convergence rates as the scaled parameter and the degree of the local approximation polynomial increase. Moreover, an accurate Levin method for dealing with highly oscillatory integrals is derived from the barycentric formula.
In this paper, we propose two kinds of extended barycentric rational schemes via (non-conformally) scaled transformations for approximating functions of singularities, which are bulit upon applying the barycentric interpolation formula of the second kind at two kinds of mapped nodes: (i) equispaced nodes and (ii) (shifted) Chebyshev nodes. While the weights in interpolation formula are selected inspired by the works of Berrut, Floater and Hormann. Ample numerical tests show that the extended barycentric rational schemes are efficient and can achieve higher convergence rates as the scaled parameter and the degree of the local approximation polynomial increase. Moreover, from the barycentric formula, it is easy to derive the difference matrices at these mapped nodes, which leads to an accurate Levin method for dealing with highly oscillatory integrals with the integrands of algebraic singularities. Numerical experiments are carried out to illustrate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed schemes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available