4.6 Article

How are granulocytes for transfusion best used? The past, the present and the future

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 200, Issue 4, Pages 420-428

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18445

Keywords

blood transfusion; granulocytes; outcomes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Granulocyte transfusions are commonly used in the treatment of severe neutropenia with refractory infection, but there is still uncertainty regarding the optimal use of these transfusions. The short shelf life of current products limits timely access and poses challenges for practice and clinical studies. Future methods should focus on optimizing donor-derived granulocyte products, such as manufactured neutrophils or improved functionality and longevity of existing ones.
Granulocyte transfusions continue to be used in clinical practice, predominantly for treatment of refractory infection in the setting of severe neutropenia. There is biological plausibility for effectiveness in these patients with deficiencies of neutrophils, either as a consequence of disease or treatment. However, there is a chequered history of conducting and completing interventional trials to define optimal use, and many uncertainties remain regarding schedule and dose. Practice and clinical studies are severely limited by the short shelf life and viability of current products, which often restricts the timely access to granulocyte transfusions. In the future, methods are needed to optimise donor-derived granulocyte products. Options include use of manufactured neutrophils, expanded and engineered from stem cells. Further possibilities include manipulation of neutrophils to enhance their function and/or longevity. Granulocyte transfusions contain a heterogeneous mix of cells, and there is additional interest in how these transfusions may have immunomodulatory effects, including for potential uses as adjuncts for anti-cancer effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available