4.7 Review

A systematic assessment of cell type deconvolution algorithms for DNA methylation data

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac449

Keywords

DNA methylation; cell type heterogeneity; deconvolution; epigenetics; EWAS

Funding

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) [U010H011478, U010H012257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic assessment of computational deconvolution methods and their role in estimating cell type proportions. The proposed framework, methylDeConv, integrates multiple deconvolution methods and allows for the construction of an extended reference library with cell-type-specific CpG selection. The study found that deconvolution based on the extended reference library is critical for accurate cell proportion estimation in non-blood tissues.
We performed systematic assessment of computational deconvolution methods that play an important role in the estimation of cell type proportions from bulk methylation data. The proposed framework methylDeConv (available as an R package) integrates several deconvolution methods for methylation profiles (Illumina HumanMethylation450 and MethylationEPIC arrays) and offers different cell-type-specific CpG selection to construct the extended reference library which incorporates the main immune cell subsets, epithelial cells and cell-free DNAs. We compared the performance of different deconvolution algorithms via simulations and benchmark datasets and further investigated the associations of the estimated cell type proportions to cancer therapy in breast cancer and subtypes in melanoma methylation case studies. Our results indicated that the deconvolution based on the extended reference library is critical to obtain accurate estimates of cell proportions in non-blood tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available