Criterion validity of the brief test of adult cognition by telephone (BTACT) for mild traumatic brain injury

Objectives There is a growing demand for remote assessment options for measuring cognition after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The current study evaluated the criterion validity of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) in distinguishing between adults with mTBI and trauma controls (TC) who sustained injuries not involving the head or neck. Methods The BTACT was administered to the mTBI (n = 46) and TC (n = 35) groups at 1-2 weeks post-injury. Participants also completed the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Results The BTACT global composite score did not significantly differ between the groups (t(79) = -1.04, p = 0.30); the effect size was small (d = 0.23). In receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, the BTACT demonstrated poor accuracy in differentiating between the groups (AUC = 0.567, SE = 0.065, 95% CI [0.44, 0.69]). The BTACT's ability to discriminate between mTBI and TCs did not improve after excluding mTBI participants (n = 15) who denied ongoing cognitive symptoms (AUC = 0.567, SE = 0.072, 95% CI [0.43, 0.71]). Conclusions The BTACT may lack sensitivity to subacute cognitive impairment attributable to mTBI (i.e., not explained by bodily pain, post-traumatic stress, and other nonspecific effects of injury).

Automated summary

This study evaluated the effectiveness of using the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) to distinguish between adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and trauma controls without head or neck injuries. The results showed that the BTACT had poor accuracy in differentiating between the two groups and did not significantly differ in terms of overall scores. Therefore, the BTACT may lack sensitivity to subacute cognitive impairment caused by mTBI.