4.6 Article

I can't do it: A qualitative study exploring case and contact experiences with COVID-19 contact tracing

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14265-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Yale School of Public Health Dean's Award
  2. T32 training grant [T32GM007205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the engagement in contact tracing for COVID-19 and found that experiences, environments, and individual characteristics influence the participation. To improve engagement, programs should address physical and emotional needs, clarify public communications, address structural and social factors, and establish trust.
Background Low engagement in contact tracing for COVID-19 dramatically reduces its impact, but little is known about how experiences, environments and characteristics of cases and contacts influence engagement. Methods We recruited a convenience sample of COVID-19 cases and contacts from the New Haven Health Department's contact tracing program for interviews about their contact tracing experiences. We analyzed transcripts thematically, organized themes using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model, and identified candidate interventions using the linked Behavior Change Wheel Framework. Results We interviewed 21 cases and 12 contacts. Many felt physically or psychologically incapable of contact tracing participation due to symptoms or uncertainty about protocols. Environmental factors and social contacts also influenced engagement. Finally, physical symptoms, emotions and low trust in and expectations of public health authorities influenced motivation to participate. Conclusion To improve contact tracing uptake, programs should respond to clients' physical and emotional needs; increase clarity of public communications; address structural and social factors that shape behaviors and opportunities; and establish and maintain trust. We identify multiple potential interventions that may help achieve these goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available