4.6 Article

Statistical modeling of health space based on metabolic stress and oxidative stress scores

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14081-0

Keywords

Metabolic stress; Oxidative stress; Health space

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning through the National Research Foundation [2013M3A9C4078158]
  2. Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI16C2037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a novel two-dimensional health space method based on scores of metabolic stress and oxidative stress. Through simulation and validation studies, the usefulness of the proposed method was demonstrated.
Background Health space (HS) is a statistical way of visualizing individual's health status in multi-dimensional space. In this study, we propose a novel HS in two-dimensional space based on scores of metabolic stress and of oxidative stress. Methods These scores were derived from three statistical models: logistic regression model, logistic mixed effect model, and proportional odds model. HSs were developed using Korea National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey data with 32,140 samples. To evaluate and compare the performance of the HSs, we also developed the Health Space Index (HSI) which is a quantitative performance measure based on the approximate 95% confidence ellipses of HS. Results Through simulation studies, we confirmed that HS from the proportional odds model showed highest power in discriminating health status of individual (subject). Further validation studies were conducted using two independent cohort datasets: a health examination dataset from Ewha-Boramae cohort with 862 samples and a population-based cohort from the Korea association resource project with 3,199 samples. Conclusions These validation studies using two independent datasets successfully demonstrated the usefulness of the proposed HS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available