4.6 Article

Evaluating the feasibility of the Community Score Card and subsequent contraceptive behavior in Kisumu, Kenya

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14388-y

Keywords

Social accountability; Contraception; Quality of care; Kenya; Mystery clients; Sub-Saharan Africa; Provider bias

Funding

  1. David & Lucile Packard Foundation [2019-69088]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P2C HD047879]
  3. Ruth L Kirschstein National Research Service Award [T32 HD049302]
  4. Population Research Infrastructure grant from the NICHD [P2C HD047873]
  5. NICHD [T32 HD52468]
  6. Population Infrastructure grant [P2C HD050924]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explored the feasibility and impact of implementing social accountability intervention (CSC) in Kenya, finding that the involvement and support of communities and service providers are key factors in improving service quality, but some providers' entrenched behaviors are difficult to change, resulting in only minor improvements in quality.
Background Women seeking family planning services from public-sector facilities in low- and middle-income countries sometimes face provider-imposed barriers to care. Social accountability is an approach that could address provider-imposed barriers by empowering communities to hold their service providers to account for service quality. Yet little is known about the feasibility and potential impact of such efforts in the context of contraceptive care. We piloted a social accountability intervention-the Community Score Card (CSC)-in three public healthcare facilities in western Kenya and use a mix of quantitative and qualitative methodologies to describe the feasibility and impact on family planning service provision. Methods We implemented and evaluated the CSC in a convenience sample of three public-sector facility-community dyads in Kisumu County, Kenya. Within each dyad, communities met to identify and prioritize needs, develop corresponding indicators, and used a score card to rate the quality of family planning service provision and monitor improvement. To ensure young, unmarried people had a voice in identifying the unique challenges they face, youth working groups (YWG) led all CSC activities. The feasibility and impact of CSC activities were evaluated using mystery client visits, unannounced visits, focus group discussions with YWG members and providers, repeated assessment of score card indicators, and service delivery statistics. Results The involvement of community health volunteers and supportive community members - as well as the willingness of some providers to consider changes to their own behaviors-were key score card facilitators. Conversely, community bias against family planning was a barrier to wider participation in score card activities and the intractability of some provider behaviors led to only small shifts in quality improvement. Service statistics did not reveal an increase in the percent of women receiving family planning services. Conclusion Successful and impactful implementation of the CSC in the Kenyan context requires intensive community and provider sensitization, and pandemic conditions may have muted the impact on contraceptive uptake in this small pilot effort. Further investigation is needed to understand whether the CSC - or other social accountability efforts - can result in improved contraceptive access.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available