4.4 Article

Muscle magnetic resonance imaging abnormality in neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a case report

Journal

BMC NEUROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02937-2

Keywords

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome; Schizophrenia; Antipsychotic drug; Muscle pathology; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry [2-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports muscle MRI abnormalities in a patient with neuroleptic malignant syndrome, showing an association with non-inflammatory myopathic changes. This finding is important for understanding the pathological mechanisms of neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
Background Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare and occasionally fatal undesirable reaction to dopamine antagonists, and its phenotype is diverse owing to causative drugs. Classically, elevation of serum creatine kinase is described in NMS. Some reports have described muscular pathological findings; however, muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been reported previously. Case presentation A 63-year-old woman with a history of schizophrenia presented to our hospital with a high fever, excessive sweating, muscle weakness, and elevated serum creatine kinase levels. Muscle MRI revealed T2 high-intensity lesions in several muscles with gadolinium enhancement, and the pathology of the muscle biopsy showed a very mild presence of muscle fiber necrosis and regeneration with type 2c fibers without inflammation. Her symptoms resolved by treatment with levodopa/carbidopa, dantrolene. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with NMS. Conclusions This is the first report of muscle MRI abnormalities in a patient with NMS. Muscle MRI abnormalities in NMS may be associated with non-inflammatory myopathic changes. The cause of creatine kinase elevation cannot be explained by abnormal strong muscle contraction nor inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available