4.5 Article

Patient-reported outcomes following cemented versus cementless primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05899-1

Keywords

Knee arthroplasty; Cemented TKA; Cementless TKA; Patient-Reported outcomes

Funding

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award [PCS-1402-09328, R01HS024714]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using cemented and cementless fixation methods. The findings showed that patients with cemented fixation experienced greater improvements in knee outcomes in the early post-operative period compared to those with cementless fixation.
Background Existing studies of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on fixation methods (cemented vs cementless) are limited to single centers with small sample sizes. Using multicentered data,, we compared baseline and early post-operative global and condition-specific PROs between patients undergoing cemented versus cementless TKA. Methods With PROs prospectively collected through Comparative Effectiveness Pulmonary Embolism Prevention After Hip and Knee Replacement (PEPPER) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02810704), we examined pre- and post-operative (1, 3, and 6-months) outcomes in 5,961 patients undergoing primary TKA enrolled by 28 medical centers between December 2016 and August 2021. Outcomes included the short-form of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-Jr.), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health (PROMIS-PH), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). To minimize selection bias, we performed a 1-to-1 propensity score matched analysis to assess relative pre- to post-operative change in outcomes within and between cemented and cementless TKA groups. Results With greater than 90% follow-up, significant pre to- post-operative improvements were observed in both groups. At 6 months, the cemented TKA group achieved a 3.3 point (55% of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference) greater improvement in the mean KOOS-Jr. (95%CI: 0.36, 6.30; P = 0.028) than did the cementless group with no significant between-group differences in PROMIS-PH and NPRS. Conclusions In a large cohort of primary TKAs, patients with cemented fixation reported early incremental benefit in KOOS-Jr. over those with cementless TKA. Future studies are warranted to capture longer follow-up of PROs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available