4.2 Review

The effects of powerlines on bustards: how best to mitigate, how best to monitor?

Journal

BIRD CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0959270922000314

Keywords

Bustards; Powerlines; Collision and avoidance; Mitigation; Monitoring

Funding

  1. Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd.
  2. FundacAo para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [DL57/2019/CP 1440/CT 0021]
  3. REN Biodiversity Chair
  4. FCT [IF/01053/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bustards are highly threatened birds that are particularly susceptible to mortality at powerlines. The most effective solutions to prevent deaths are burying the lines, routing them away from bustard-frequented areas, or making them redundant with local energy generation. Dynamic bird flight diverters may also help reduce mortality.
Bustards comprise a highly threatened family of birds and, being relatively fast, heavy fliers with very limited frontal visual fields, are particularly susceptible to mortality at powerlines. These infrastructures can also displace them from immediately adjacent habitat and act as barriers, fragmenting their ranges. With geographically ever wider energy transmission and distribution grids, the powerline threat to bustards is constantly growing. Reviewing the published and unpublished literature up to January 2021, we found 2,774 records of bustard collision with powerlines, involving 14 species. Some studies associate powerline collisions with population declines. To avoid mortalities, the most effective solution is to bury the lines; otherwise they should be either routed away from bustard-frequented areas, or made redundant by local energy generation. When possible, new lines should run parallel to existing structures and wires should preferably be as low and thick as possible, with minimal conductor obstruction of vertical airspace, although it should be noted that these measures require additional testing. A review of studies finds limited evidence that 'bird flight diverters' (BFDs; devices fitted to wires to induce evasive action) achieve significant reductions in mortality for some bustard species. Nevertheless, dynamic BFDs are preferable to static ones as they are thought to perform more effectively. Rigorous evaluation of powerline mortalities, and effectiveness of mitigation measures, need systematic carcass surveys and bias corrections. Whenever feasible, assessments of displacement and barrier effects should be undertaken. Following best practice guidelines proposed with this review paper to monitor impacts and mitigation could help build a reliable body of evidence on best ways to prevent bustard mortality at powerlines. Research should focus on validating mitigation measures and quantifying, particularly for threatened bustards, the population effects of powerline grids at the national scale, to account for cumulative impacts on bustards and establish an equitable basis for compensation measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available