4.7 Article

Determination of an implantation area for interstitial fluid extraction in cows and feasibility of adapted microneedles

Journal

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages 62-70

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.07.007

Keywords

Livestock; Biosensor; Cow; Microneedles; 3D printing

Funding

  1. Region AuvergneeRhone-Alpes [SmartRepro project]
  2. The French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
  3. National Research Institute for Agriculture Food and Environment (INRAe)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a preliminary study on a wearable system for monitoring biomarkers in dairy and suckling cattle. The study focuses on finding the optimal implantation location (ears) and designing adapted microneedles for sampling interstitial fluids beneath the cow's skin.
We present a preliminary study of a wearable system to monitor biomarkers for dairy and suckling cattle. Finding the optimal location on the cow body (ears) and designing the adapted microneedles to reach the interstitial fluids underneath the cow skin are the two points addressed here.For the selection of the location, 4 breeds of suckling cows (Aubrac, Charolaise, Lim-ousine, Salers) and 3 breeds of dairy cows (Abondance, Montbe ⠁liarde, Holstein) were chosen. Measurements of the thickness of the ear tissues were conducted on three areas of the ear (top, apex and base of the pinna), on the external and internal sides. Results show that the apex of the pinna, external side, is the best area for microneedle implantation with an implantation window of 1403 +/- 589 mm (DeepDe), considering all breeds. To reach this implantation window located between the stratum corneum and the cartilage, the microneedle has to pass through 1323 +/- 404 mm of tissues (SupDe), considering all breeds. From these results, a microneedle design was made on SolidWorks. With a conical shape 2.89 mm in height and a conical channel 300 mm in diameter (at the tip of the microneedle), the model was made using 3D printing. The resulting microneedles respect the SolidWorks design with fair accuracy. They were connected to a microfluidic channel for sampling or releasing fluids.(c) 2022 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available