4.8 Article

Nitrogen removal and mechanism of an extremely high-ammonia tolerant heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacterium Alcaligenes faecalis TF-1

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 361, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127643

Keywords

Leachate; High ammonia nitrogen; High salt; Heterotrophic nitrification -aerobic; denitrification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908099]
  2. Project of Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Education Commission of China [KJQN202001114]
  3. Project of Chongqing Banan District of China [2020QC368]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A highly salt and high ammonia nitrogen tolerant heterotrophic nitrifying bacterium, Alcaligenes faecalis TF-1, was isolated from landfill leachate. The study investigated its nitrogen removal pathway and optimized nitrogen removal conditions.
A novel heterotrophic nitrifying bacterium with high salt and high ammonia nitrogen tolerance, Alcaligenes faecalis TF-1, was isolated from the leachate of a landfill. The verification of nitrogen removal efficiency of different nitrogen sources and PCR amplification electrophoresis results showed that the HN-AD pathway of the strain TF-1 was NH4+ -* NH2OH -* NO -* N2O -* N2. The results of parameter optimization showed that the optimal nitrogen removal conditions were as follows: sodium citrate as carbon source, C/N = 16, pH = 7, and NH4+-N loading of 808.21 mg/L. The strain TF-1 could remove about 94.60% of ammonia nitrogen (1963.94 mg/ L). The salinity tolerance range of the strain TF-1 was 0-70 g/L, and the removal efficiency was 52.87% at salinity 70 g/L and NH4+-N concentration 919.20 mg/L and 55.67% at pH = 10 and NH4+-N concentration 994.82 mg/L. The extreme environmental adaptability and remarkable nitrogen removal performance make this strain a promising candidate in leachate treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available