4.6 Article

Intelligent estimation of blood glucose level using wristband PPG signal and physiological parameters

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103876

Keywords

Blood glucose monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus; Feature selection; Non-invasive; PPG; Regression; SVM; XGBoost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a design for a non-invasive blood glucose estimation system using novel features from wristband photoplethysmogram signals and physiological parameters. The model is validated using a dataset from a hospital in Cuenca Ecuador, and the results demonstrate the potential of wearable blood glucose monitoring technology.
The inconvenience and risk associated with the regular use of invasive blood glucose measurements has led to tremendous research in this area. This paper proposes the design of a non-invasive blood glucose estimation system using novel Mel frequency cepstral coefficients features of wristband photoplethysmogram signal and physiological parameters. A dataset from 217 participants of a hospital in Cuenca Ecuador is used to validate the proposed model. The support vector regression (SVR) and extreme gradient boost regression (XGBR) techniques are used to estimate blood glucose levels (BGL). The XGBR technique achieves the least value for the standard error of prediction (SEP), 9.78 mg/dL. Further, 5 features are selected from the feature set based on the feature importance in XGBR. The XGBR model with the reduced feature set results in further reduction of SEP value (5.53 mg/dL) with a correlation coefficient of 0.99. Standard Clarke error grid analysis and Bland-Altman analysis shows that the predicted glucose values are in the clinically acceptable region. The results of the proposed model demonstrate the potential of wearable BGL monitoring technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available