4.7 Review

Dispersibility Characterization of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Polymeric-Based Composites

Journal

BIOMACROMOLECULES
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 4439-4468

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00987

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
  2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Polysaccharide Materials and Modification from Guangxi University for Nationalities
  3. [2021CFB302]
  4. [GXPSMM20-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides a comprehensive summary and exploration of the dispersion characterization of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) in polymer matrices, including direct observation, indirect evaluation, and quantified evaluation. Decision tree flowcharts are provided as a reference for selecting appropriate characterization methods.
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are hydrophilic nano-particles extracted from biomass with properties and functions different from cellulose and are being developed for property-oriented applications such as high stiffness, abundant active groups, and biocompatibility. It has broad application prospects in the field of composite materials, while the dispersibility of the CNC in polymers is the key to its application performance. Many reviews have discussed in-depth the modification strategies to improve the dispersibility of the CNC and summarized all characterization for the CNC, but there are no reviews on the in-depth exploration of dispersion characterization. This review is a comprehensive summary of the characterization of CNC dispersion in the matrix in terms of direct observation, indirect evaluation, and quantified evaluation, summarizing how and why different characterization tools reveal dispersibility. In addition, decision tree flowcharts are presented to provide the reader with a reference for selecting the appropriate characterization method for a specific composite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available